Yang X, Gao Q, Xi Z, Zhao P, Zhao J. Prevalence and Heterogeneity of Swine Influenza Virus in China From 2010 to 2025: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2026 Feb 13;2026:1096796
Background: Swine influenza virus (SIV) is endemic in China, threatening the swine industry and public health. This meta-analysis estimated the national pooled prevalence of SIV (2010-2025) and identified key sources of heterogeneity.
Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, six databases were searched, yielding 73 eligible studies with 411,930 samples. A random-effects model pooled prevalence estimates, and subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity.
Results: The pooled SIV prevalence was 30.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.5%-36.4%) with extreme heterogeneity (I 2 = 100%, p < 0.001). Key drivers included diagnostic method (serological: 37.1% vs. virological: 2.6%), geography (Southwest China: 54.3%), and viral genotype (H1 > H3). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, but publication bias (Egger´s test, p = 0.0009) suggests potential overestimation.
Conclusion: SIV is widespread in China but exhibits marked spatiotemporal and methodological variability. A single national prevalence figure is insufficient for risk assessment. Surveillance and control strategies must be targeted and context-specific. This study provides a critical, albeit potentially overestimated, epidemiological baseline for evidence-based interventions.
Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, six databases were searched, yielding 73 eligible studies with 411,930 samples. A random-effects model pooled prevalence estimates, and subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity.
Results: The pooled SIV prevalence was 30.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.5%-36.4%) with extreme heterogeneity (I 2 = 100%, p < 0.001). Key drivers included diagnostic method (serological: 37.1% vs. virological: 2.6%), geography (Southwest China: 54.3%), and viral genotype (H1 > H3). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, but publication bias (Egger´s test, p = 0.0009) suggests potential overestimation.
Conclusion: SIV is widespread in China but exhibits marked spatiotemporal and methodological variability. A single national prevalence figure is insufficient for risk assessment. Surveillance and control strategies must be targeted and context-specific. This study provides a critical, albeit potentially overestimated, epidemiological baseline for evidence-based interventions.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Avian Influenza in Humans: Virology, Transmission, and Clinical Priorities 15 hours ago
- Global influenza epidemiology after 2020: patterns of circulation, epidemic timing and duration, and implications for vaccination strategies 1 days ago
- Coding complete genome of LPAI H16N3 virus from Australia suggests intercontinental movement 2 days ago
- Detection of antibodies to avian influenza virus H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b in naturally infected cattle for more than a year 2 days ago
- A C-type single-domain antibody with protective efficacy against H1N1 via respiratory administration 2 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


