Endo M, Tanishima M, Ibaragi K, et al. Clinical Phase II and III Studies of an AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 Influenza Vaccine Produced in an EB66 ? Cell Culture Platform. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020;10.1111/irv.
Background: We have developed an AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine produced in an EB66? cell culture platform (KD-295).
Objectives: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group comparison study and the phase III study was conducted in an open-label, non-randomized, uncontrolled study.
Methods: Healthy adult volunteers aged 20 - 64 years enrolled in the phase II and III studies (N = 248 and N = 369) received KD-295 intramuscularly twice with a 21-day interval. After administration, immune response and adverse events were evaluated. In the phase II study, four different vaccine formulations were compared: MA (3.75 μg hemagglutinin [HA] antigen + AS03 adjuvant system), MB (3.75 μg HA + 1/2AS03), HA (7.5 μg HA + AS03), and HB (7.5 μg HA + 1/2AS03). In the phase III study, the MA formulation was further evaluated.
Results: In the phase II study, all four vaccine formulations were well-tolerated and no SAE related to vaccination were observed. The MA formulation was slightly more immunogenic and less reactogenic among the vaccine formulations. Therefore, the MA formulation was selected for the phase III study, and it was well-tolerated and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed. The vaccine fulfilled the three immunogenicity criteria described in the Japanese guidelines.
Conclusions: These data indicate that the MA formulation of KD-295 was well-tolerated and highly immunogenic and it can be considered a useful pandemic and pre-pandemic influenza vaccine.
Objectives: In accordance with Japanese guidelines for development of pandemic prototype vaccines, the phase II study was conducted in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group comparison study and the phase III study was conducted in an open-label, non-randomized, uncontrolled study.
Methods: Healthy adult volunteers aged 20 - 64 years enrolled in the phase II and III studies (N = 248 and N = 369) received KD-295 intramuscularly twice with a 21-day interval. After administration, immune response and adverse events were evaluated. In the phase II study, four different vaccine formulations were compared: MA (3.75 μg hemagglutinin [HA] antigen + AS03 adjuvant system), MB (3.75 μg HA + 1/2AS03), HA (7.5 μg HA + AS03), and HB (7.5 μg HA + 1/2AS03). In the phase III study, the MA formulation was further evaluated.
Results: In the phase II study, all four vaccine formulations were well-tolerated and no SAE related to vaccination were observed. The MA formulation was slightly more immunogenic and less reactogenic among the vaccine formulations. Therefore, the MA formulation was selected for the phase III study, and it was well-tolerated and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed. The vaccine fulfilled the three immunogenicity criteria described in the Japanese guidelines.
Conclusions: These data indicate that the MA formulation of KD-295 was well-tolerated and highly immunogenic and it can be considered a useful pandemic and pre-pandemic influenza vaccine.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Avian Influenza Weekly Update # 1062: 18 September 2026 4 hours ago
- Effectiveness of the 2025-2026 seasonal influenza vaccine among U.S. veterans: an observational study 6 hours ago
- Streamlined CRISPR-based assays for detection and subtyping of H5 and H7 avian influenza 2 days ago
- Host-specific effects of a pandemic H1N1 M gene on canine H3N2 influenza virus replication and immune responses 2 days ago
- Rapid Decline of Nesting Peregrine Falcons in the San Francisco Bay Region of California Synchronous with an Outbreak of H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza 2 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


