Pillsbury AJ, et al. Active surveillance of 2017 seasonal influenza vaccine safety: an observational cohort study of individuals aged 6 months and older in Australia. BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e023263.
OBJECTIVE:
To actively solicit adverse events experienced in the days following immunisation with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine using Australia´s near real-time, participant-based vaccine safety surveillance system, AusVaxSafety.
DESIGN AND SETTING:
Observational cohort study conducted in 194 sentinel surveillance immunisation sites (primary care, hospital and community-based clinics) across Australia.
PARTICIPANTS:
Individuals aged ≥6 months who received a routine seasonal influenza vaccine at a participating site (n=102?911) and responded to a survey (via short message service or email) sent 3 days after vaccination about adverse events experienced (n=73?892; 71.8%).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Near real-time and cumulative participant-reported rates of any adverse event, fever or medical attendance experienced within 3 days after vaccination overall, by brand, age, pregnancy status and concomitant vaccine receipt.
RESULTS:
Participant median age was 57 years (range: 6 months to 102 years); 58.1% (n=42?869) were female and 2.7% (n=2018) were pregnant. Near real-time fast initial response cumulative summation and Bayesian analyses of weekly event rates did not demonstrate a safety signal. Children aged 6 months to 4 years had higher event rates (522/6180; 8.4%) compared with older ages; participants aged ≥65 years reported fewer events (1695/28 154; 6.0%). There were no clinically significant differences in safety between brands, by age group or overall. Cumulative data analysis demonstrated that concomitant vaccination was associated with increased rates of fever (2.1% vs 0.8%) and medical attendance (0.8% vs 0.4%), although all rates were low and did not exceed expected levels.
CONCLUSIONS:
Novel, postmarketing AusVaxSafety surveillance demonstrated comparable and expected safety outcomes for the 2017 quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine brands used in Australia. These near real-time, participant-reported data are expected to encourage confidence in vaccine safety and promote uptake.
To actively solicit adverse events experienced in the days following immunisation with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine using Australia´s near real-time, participant-based vaccine safety surveillance system, AusVaxSafety.
DESIGN AND SETTING:
Observational cohort study conducted in 194 sentinel surveillance immunisation sites (primary care, hospital and community-based clinics) across Australia.
PARTICIPANTS:
Individuals aged ≥6 months who received a routine seasonal influenza vaccine at a participating site (n=102?911) and responded to a survey (via short message service or email) sent 3 days after vaccination about adverse events experienced (n=73?892; 71.8%).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Near real-time and cumulative participant-reported rates of any adverse event, fever or medical attendance experienced within 3 days after vaccination overall, by brand, age, pregnancy status and concomitant vaccine receipt.
RESULTS:
Participant median age was 57 years (range: 6 months to 102 years); 58.1% (n=42?869) were female and 2.7% (n=2018) were pregnant. Near real-time fast initial response cumulative summation and Bayesian analyses of weekly event rates did not demonstrate a safety signal. Children aged 6 months to 4 years had higher event rates (522/6180; 8.4%) compared with older ages; participants aged ≥65 years reported fewer events (1695/28 154; 6.0%). There were no clinically significant differences in safety between brands, by age group or overall. Cumulative data analysis demonstrated that concomitant vaccination was associated with increased rates of fever (2.1% vs 0.8%) and medical attendance (0.8% vs 0.4%), although all rates were low and did not exceed expected levels.
CONCLUSIONS:
Novel, postmarketing AusVaxSafety surveillance demonstrated comparable and expected safety outcomes for the 2017 quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine brands used in Australia. These near real-time, participant-reported data are expected to encourage confidence in vaccine safety and promote uptake.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- High-throughput pseudovirus neutralisation maps the antigenic landscape of influenza A/H1N1 viruses 11 hours ago
- Timely vaccine strain selection and genomic surveillance improve evolutionary forecast accuracy of seasonal influenza A/H3N2 11 hours ago
- Evaluation of a Novel Data Source for National Influenza Surveillance: Influenza Hospitalization Data in the National Healthcare Safety Network, United States, September 2021-April 2024 11 hours ago
- Scenarios for pre-pandemic zoonotic influenza preparedness and response 11 hours ago
- Stability of Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus in Milk from Infected Cows and Virus-Spiked Milk 1 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


